hello clients, prospective clients, and business alliance members. many people bemoan president obama's political win and much hand-wringing words stream through our media services. listening to npr and wtul new orleans this morning highlighted that according to npr: a) obama does not have a mandate compared to bush, and (b) cokie roberts said that obama needs to court mitt romney's core constituency, a slowly winnowing population with its own agenda, relative to the remaining population.
fact: american demographics have begun aggregating in geographic regions within the united states, and marijuana and gay marriage remain a non-issue in many parts of the country; however, the "moral majority" thinks otherwise, believing that they alone have a right into your bedroom and into your life.
unfortunately, the smaller government crowd within the conservative party will not exclude the military and county paramilitary forces with its legions of private military contractors. why retain enforcers when voters approved behavior that has shown nominal social harm? when will state rights' powers remain consistent within political dialogue? how can you compare actual human slavery to smoking a joint as a state rights' issue?
who cares about disproportionate imprisonment of black and hispanics for similar marijuana possession charges as white americans? have we created slavery by another name with this drug enforcement architecture?
the banking industry, weapons manufacturers, hedge funds, mexican cartels, freelance human traffickers, drug runners, private prisons, and american paramilitary enforcement agencies remain above the law. why not stop the charade by legalizing marijuana? just ask colorado and washington!
why have a media outlet crown your mandate, when the people have spoken and handed mitt romney back to his constituents? general mandate appears obvious. think about all the super pac money well spent when we have starving children, monstrous killing in foreign hot flash points, and rising seas; surely, we can spend our money more wisely, or not.
president obama will continue the massive killing overseas and work his best to keep the angry hordes off our shores while enriching the ultra-rich and disenfranchising the poor; even if you do not believe that statement, just know he only has four years left physically and maybe ten years ideologically. he can only do so much during that time.
too bad the pentagon does not remember the roman empire days. why would you arm the afghanis, or any other auxiliary military force with a competing agenda, after helping create the osama bin laden mythology? have the custom made late 1970's and early 1980's stinger military hardware not killed enough americans? some bright-eyed, saggy cheeked pentagon child desired training the afghani security forces, similarly to los zetas trained on my tax dollars at the school of the americas.
to the pentagon and its usury-, military- and prision-industrial complex vampires, you did not ask my permission to conduct morally loose escapades. also, why do you never pick up the tab? our relationship needs more appropriate consideration with less self-aggrandizement from your part; hopefully, we can create some transparency in exchange for my tax dollars.
opaque operations aimed at killing people does not interest me. so, did we really win with obama?
No comments:
Post a Comment